Click on each case headline to read more about how we have successfully defended our motoring clients.
Failing to provide information about who was driving - S172
Our client gave evidence to confirm that due to difficulties with his post, the notices were not received and so he could not possibly respond and give information. This was accepted and our client was acquitted.
The offence of failing to provide information about who was driving a motor vehicle is a fast growing area of law resulting from the enormous spread of cameras now covering many of Britainâ€™s roads. Often vehicle owners are unclear as to how to proceed as they may be unable to identify the driver on a particular day or time, especially in a family or company environment. Our success rate in this type of matter is extraordinarily high. Click here if you need our help.
Driving whilst unfit through drugs
Our client is clearly seen on CCTV snorting a white substance and driving. Due to a procedural error, where incorrect questions were asked, the toxicology report was argued to be inadmissible leaving no evidence of drugs. The case had to be withdrawn and client acquitted.
Please contact us here to find out what we can do for you.
Biker doing 110mph with 11 year old daughter as pillion
Our client was caught travelling at 110mph on a dual carriageway with his 11 year old daughter on the back of his powerful bike when he was stopped by the police. He pleaded guilty and offered his apologies for the offence in addition to enrolling for a safe driver course operated by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. Despite his speed and the age of his passenger a fine of just Â£400 was imposed together with a 56 day ban. See full article here…
If you need our advice about a speeding offence then please click here and provide us with some brief details...
You may think that if you were arrested at the roadside after producing a positive breath test and then went on to the Police Station where positive tests for alcohol, showed a reading of 2 Â½ times the legal limit, the inevitable result would be a conviction. However in another case, where the reading was exactly that, our client was acquitted on the basis that the procedure for obtaining specimens had not been followed correctly by the Police.
We may be able to help you so please contact us here...
Drunk in charge of a motor vehicle
Drivers alleged to have been drunk in charge often wait too long to contact their lawyer and mistakenly give damaging admissions in interviews. A recent case could have been prevented in which admissions of the quantity of alcohol that had been consumed were made by a driver. However, when breaches of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act were admitted by the Police, the interview admissions were excluded and as a result the defendant was not disqualified from driving.
We could help you so please contact us here...
It is perhaps little known that overtaking across solid double white line markings in the middle of the highway can lead to a charge of dangerous driving which would result in a 12 month disqualification. However in a case we defended, the Prosecution were unable to establish that the line marking was complete and visible at the time of the alleged offence. On this basis the defendant was successfully acquitted.
In the vast majority of cases, clients are successfully defended, and may also receive a part of their costs from the court.
Please contact us here to see what we can do for you.